Лучшие альтернативы Bitpace в 2026 году

Seventy-five currencies and no chains#

The asset count is among the broadest in this index and it arrives with no statement of which blockchains carry it. The chain decides what a payment costs the customer and how long confirmation takes.

A stablecoin on one network settles in seconds for cents and on another takes minutes for dollars. That is not a technicality; it is the difference between a checkout that converts and one that does not.

Nothing at all is priced#

Processing, conversion and payout are all recorded here as checked absences. For a merchant that means the evaluation cannot begin without a sales conversation, which is the recorded reason people look elsewhere.

All three replacements publish a rate. Two of them also publish enough of the rest to total a bill, which turns a negotiation into a comparison.

White label is the reason this card exists#

The proposition is a ready-made product plugged into a partner's platform under the partner's brand. That is a different business from selling a checkout to a shop, and it explains the pricing silence more convincingly than most.

Two of the three replacements document white label as well, and neither prices it either. That is the category norm rather than a fault of any one provider.

What leaving costs you#

Settlement into euros, sterling or dollars, or into crypto, with the choice left to the merchant. Three fiat currencies is better than the euro-only providers elsewhere in this index.

Also two named entities with published registrations: a Canadian money services business registered with FINTRAC and a second entity under a Mwali licence. Naming them at all is more than several cards here manage.

Where each replacement lands#

Cryptomus is the closest structural match: white label, a broad asset list, seven plugins and a published 0.4% entry rate. It answers the pricing complaint without giving up the partner shape.

CoinsPaid keeps white label and fiat settlement, publishes 0.5%, and adds twelve years of operating history from a named Estonian base with an igaming specialisation behind it.

The plugin shelf grows on every route#

Three named integrations here — WooCommerce, OpenCart and Magento — against seven, two and eleven at the replacements. Only one route narrows it, and that one narrows it deliberately toward an API audience.

For a partner deploying to its own merchants the plugin count matters less than the sub-account model, which none of these providers documents publicly on either side.

The reseller questions nobody publishes#

Sub-merchant accounts, per-merchant settlement, per-merchant reporting and a way to take your own margin. None of that appears on any public page here or at any replacement.

Treat it as a separate procurement rather than a feature comparison. Ask specifically who is the merchant of record for compliance purposes, because getting that wrong is expensive in a way a pricing mistake is not.

Verification is unstated here and mostly elsewhere#

This card records merchant verification as undisclosed after checking. One replacement publishes identity and business checks; the other two publish nothing.

For a white-label partner the more important question is what verification your own merchants will face, which is downstream of your contract and not covered by any published policy.

How to compare when nothing is published#

Get a quotation here first. Your existing terms may already beat every published rate on this page, in which case the pricing complaint is about disclosure rather than about cost.

Then ask each replacement for the same structure: processing, conversion, settlement per currency and the white-label premium. Four numbers, requested identically, produce a comparison the websites cannot.

The case for staying#

If the white-label deployment is live and working, moving it is a substantial project with no published saving attached. The absence of a rate on a website is not evidence that your rate is bad.

Seventy-five currencies with three settlement options is also a strong combination on paper. Establish the chains behind it and the number may justify itself.

What a switch actually takes here#

A branded deployment is not a plugin swap. Every surface carrying your branding has to be rebuilt at the destination, and the visible parts are the easy half.

The email receipts and payment-failure pages are where provider branding survives longest, and they are the surfaces nobody demos. Ask for a sandbox and look at both before agreeing anything.

What the partner model hides from a reader#

A partner deployment is quoted per relationship on volume, risk and downstream merchant mix, so no single published figure would describe any actual contract. That is a defensible reason for silence and it is rarely stated as one.

It also means a reader cannot tell whether the terms are good. Procurement is the only route to that answer, and a partner without a procurement function is buying blind rather than buying cheaply.