Лучшие альтернативы Zaprite в 2026 году

The subscription is the recorded complaint#

Twenty-five dollars a month, or two hundred and forty a year, charged regardless of volume. Nothing else in this index bills that way, and for a business taking a payment a quarter it is dead weight.

The included credit blunts it: twenty-five dollars of transaction fees a month, three hundred a year on the annual plan. Below that ceiling the subscription is the entire bill and the arrangement is clean.

What leaving costs you, and it is a lot#

The fee cap. Transaction fees stop at fifteen dollars regardless of payment size, which on a five thousand dollar invoice is 0.3% and at fifty thousand is 0.03%. Nothing else on this site approaches that.

For a firm invoicing in the thousands, leaving is expensive by an order of magnitude. Run your own average invoice value against fifteen dollars before reading any further, because that single number may end this page.

Two assets, and one of them is a stablecoin#

Bitcoin across on-chain, Lightning and Liquid, plus Tether, with dollar payments accepted alongside. Liquid support is rare and points at a Bitcoin-native audience.

Two replacements here drop Tether entirely and support Bitcoin alone. If a customer paying in dollars-on-chain matters, only the third route preserves it and it does so by leaving this product category.

Invoicing is the product, not checkout#

Recurring invoices, payment requests and payment links are first-class, with a single WooCommerce plugin behind them. This is an accounts-receivable tool that settles in bitcoin rather than a gateway.

Two of the three replacements are gateways. Moving to one means keeping invoices wherever they live today and treating the provider as a payment endpoint, which is a different monthly workflow.

Where each replacement lands#

OpenNode keeps Bitcoin and Lightning, adds fiat settlement, and charges only when money moves: on-chain scheduled and Lightning on-demand free, on-chain on-demand at one percent.

Coinsnap keeps the same networks, offers euro payout to a bank account and brings eleven shop platforms, which suits a business whose invoicing already lives in a storefront.

The free-product wrinkle disappears#

Payment requests, invoices, recurring invoices, payment links and the point of sale carry no transaction fee here; only the API, the WooCommerce plugin and event tickets do.

No replacement prices that way. Every one of them charges on the payment regardless of which surface produced it, so a business relying on the free manual products will feel the change immediately.

Custody is unstated here and answered elsewhere#

No custody model appears on the public pages, which for a tool handling invoices is the question a reader should want answered first. Two replacements state theirs plainly.

One is custodial with fiat settlement; one is non-custodial with none. Establish which you have today before deciding which you want, because the answer may already be the one you prefer.

Nobody publishes an operating entity#

This card records jurisdiction as not stated. One replacement names a United States company; one names nobody; one is an open-source project with no company at all.

For a firm sending large invoices that gap matters more than it does for a shop taking small payments, because the amount resting with a counterparty at any moment is correspondingly larger.

The arithmetic that decides this page#

Take twelve months of payments, count how many exceeded fifteen hundred dollars, and compute what one percent would have cost on each without a cap.

If that figure exceeds the annual subscription by a comfortable margin, this provider is the cheapest option available to you and no replacement here changes that.

The case for staying#

For consultancies, agencies and professional firms billing in four figures, this is the cheapest arrangement on this site and the invoicing is better than anything else here offers.

The subscription is only dead weight below the included credit. Above it, the cap is doing work that no per-transaction provider can replicate at any rate.

What a switch actually takes here#

Recurring invoices do not transfer between providers, so every active arrangement has to be reissued and every customer told. That is a communications project rather than an integration one.

The historical invoice record is the other piece. Export it before the subscription lapses, because an accounts-receivable history is not something to rebuild from bank statements.

Who this actually competes with#

Not the gateways on this page so much as an accountant with a spreadsheet and a wallet address. That is the arrangement most bitcoin-invoicing firms have, and it is free until somebody counts the hours.

Judged against that baseline the subscription is cheap and the cap is irrelevant. Judged against a payment gateway it looks expensive, which is why the choice depends entirely on what you are replacing.