ALFAcoins: обзор

A per-asset fee table, which nobody else here publishes#

Network fees are listed asset by asset rather than described in general terms. That is the most granular disclosure on any card in this index, and it lets a merchant calculate payout cost per asset instead of estimating it.

It matters because payout cost scales with how often you withdraw rather than with revenue, so a business paying out weekly needs exactly this number and almost never gets it. A provider that publishes it has removed a whole category of unpleasant surprise.

0.99% in, and 0.99% out again#

The incoming rate sits below the category median and applies without a volume tier, which is straightforward. API payouts then carry the same 0.99% on top of the network fee, which is less commonly stated and materially changes the arithmetic for anyone paying out regularly.

For an inbound-only merchant this is a competitive card. For one running outbound volume, the same percentage applied twice needs to go into the comparison explicitly, and the payouts page covers how to weigh it.

Tether across four networks, conversion still to come#

Nineteen assets including Tether on Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain and Solana covers most stablecoin demand, and network breadth on the dominant asset matters more than raw asset count. That is a sensible shape.

Conversion pricing is listed as still to be introduced, which means converting to fiat has no published cost at all. A merchant intending to settle in bank currency cannot price this relationship from the page, however precise the rest of it is.

How this card scores where it does#

Cost scores well on the published 0.99% and on the per-asset network fee table, which is the most granular fee disclosure anywhere in this index. Coverage scores moderately on nineteen assets with good network breadth on Tether.

Onboarding, integrations and support sit at the index floor on undisclosed fields rather than on known weaknesses. The card falls below the publication threshold as a result, which keeps it out of comparisons while the profile still publishes.

Who should shortlist this#

A merchant who pays out regularly and wants the network cost knowable per asset in advance. That combination is rare enough in this category that it is the main reason to look here.

Not a merchant converting to fiat, at least not yet: conversion pricing is listed as still to be introduced, so the settlement side has no published cost at all.

What the payout table changes about planning#

Knowing the network cost per asset in advance turns payout budgeting from an estimate into arithmetic. A business paying suppliers weekly can model the annual cost before signing, which is not possible at any other provider indexed here.

It also exposes an ordinary fact that most of the category leaves implicit: network costs differ enormously between assets, so which asset you pay out in is a cost decision rather than a preference. A merchant with a choice should make it deliberately.

The counterweight is the 0.99% applied on top of that network fee for API payouts. Precision about one component does not make the other disappear, and both belong in the same calculation.

Precision on one component and silence on another is a common shape in this category, and it is worth naming rather than averaging away. Read the payout table as the strength it is, and treat the missing conversion figure as the open question it remains until somebody answers it.

For a merchant weighing this against the fully published cards in the index, the fair summary is that one component here is better documented than anywhere else and several others are not documented at all.

Where ALFAcoins sits in the index#

The short version of this card: a per-asset network fee table, which nobody else here publishes. Every figure above was read off the provider's own pages on 2026-08-31, and the fields it declines to publish are recorded as such rather than left blank.

Cost is the line to read closely here, because the per-asset payout table makes it more precise than any other card in the index. The lines below the floor are undisclosed fields rather than findings, which is why this card is kept out of comparisons.