Radom: обзор

The cheapest published rate here, with a catch in the second term#

Half a percent plus fifty cents is the lowest standard processing rate any custodial provider in this index puts in public. On a five hundred dollar payment that is 0.6% all in, which beats every other card here on the same basis.

On a ten dollar payment it is 5.5%. The flat component does not scale, and it turns a headline that reads as the cheapest option into one of the most expensive for anyone selling small digital items. Average ticket size decides this card entirely.

A price for everything, which is rarer than it should be#

Donations are priced at one percent, on-ramp and off-ramp at one percent each, and instant payouts are stated as carrying no additional fee. Only the presale product is held back for a sales conversation, and it is marked as such rather than left ambiguous.

That is a more complete public price list than most of this index manages. It lets a merchant model a year across several products without a call, which is the practical standard the method rewards.

Subscriptions are a first-class product here#

Recurring crypto billing is a named product rather than a feature bolted onto invoicing, and that is unusual. Most providers in this index treat a subscription as a repeated one-off payment and leave the retry logic, dunning and failed-renewal handling to the merchant.

For a SaaS business that difference is the entire evaluation. Combined with itemised invoicing and mass payouts under one account, this card covers a billing operation rather than just a checkout, and the SaaS page is where those requirements are set out.

Where the company sits, and why it is a con#

The operating entity is incorporated in the Cook Islands, with a company number published on the site. Fiat services are described as running through licensed and regulated financial institutions, but those institutions are not named.

That combination is listed here as a drawback and not as an accusation. A finance function asked to approve a payment processor will ask which regulated entity holds the money and under whose supervision, and neither question can be answered from the public pages.

Twelve assets across ten chains#

The published figures are twelve or more cryptocurrencies across ten or more blockchains, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron and Solana named. That is a narrow asset list on a wide set of networks, which is the shape of a provider built around stablecoins rather than around coin variety.

For most business-to-business flows that shape is correct: the assets that matter are two stablecoins on whichever chain the payer already uses. A consumer checkout meeting the long tail of holdings will find twelve short, and the stablecoin page covers where the line usually falls.

An API and no plugin shelf#

There is a prebuilt hosted checkout page and a documented API, and no named platform plugins on the pages we read. For a team with engineers that is a non-issue; for a shop owner it is the difference between an afternoon and a quotation.

Given the subscription and payout products, the audience here is clearly a platform rather than a storefront, and a platform was going to write code anyway. Judged against that audience the missing plugins matter far less than they would elsewhere in this index.

Who should shortlist this#

A platform or SaaS business with a developer, a ticket size above about fifty dollars, and a need for recurring billing and payouts from the same account. That is a specific profile and this card fits it better than anything else here.

Anyone selling cheap digital goods should price the flat fifty cents against their actual average order value before going further. It is a five-minute calculation and it will settle the question in either direction.

Where Radom sits in the index#

Strong on published pricing and product breadth, weak on jurisdiction and integration convenience, with the custody model itself left unstated. It is a card for readers who will read the whole thing rather than the headline rate.

The figures above came off the provider's own pages on 2026-09-02. Raising the weight on onboarding at the methodology page is the fastest way to see what the unanswered regulatory questions cost this card.