Лучшие альтернативы CoinsPaid в 2026 году

The specialisation is the reason to stay#

A SoftSwiss connector is not a general-purpose feature, and it is why igaming operators are here rather than at a broader processor. Point of sale, white label, mass payouts and fiat settlement are all documented alongside it.

None of the three alternatives publishes a platform connector for that vertical. Cryptomus accepts igaming and does not specialise in it, which is a different proposition and worth naming as such.

No public pricing page is the reason to leave#

Every figure has to be confirmed in writing during onboarding, which means a merchant cannot compare this provider against anything without starting a sales conversation first.

That is a real cost even when the eventual quote is good, because it makes the evaluation sequential rather than parallel. The fees guide covers what to ask for so one conversation yields a comparable number.

Fiat withdrawal is the number that bites#

Reported withdrawal costs in the 1% to 3% range can exceed the processing fee itself, which inverts the usual arithmetic: the cost of getting money out matters more than the cost of taking it in.

Ask for that figure explicitly and separately from processing. A merchant comparing a 0.5% headline against a 1% one while ignoring a 3% payout has compared the wrong two numbers entirely.

Where each replacement actually lands#

Cryptomus publishes 0.4% and maintains plugins for seven named platforms, which is the closest thing here to a like-for-like with a readable price.

NOWPayments offers the widest published asset list in the index at a flat 1%, plus non-custodial settlement, which for an operator holding large balances is the more consequential difference.

CoinGate is the option for European operators who need settlement terms in writing: the fullest fee table indexed here, with free euro withdrawals over SEPA.

What a high-risk merchant should check before moving#

Whether the replacement will actually accept your vertical in your jurisdiction, in writing, before any integration work. Acceptance is decided case by case at every provider on this page and none of them publishes a policy.

And what happens if that acceptance is withdrawn later. Providers serving high-risk verticals lose banking relationships more often than the rest of the category, and a custodial provider doing so takes your balance with it.

Custody deserves a decision here specifically#

This is a custodial provider and so is Cryptomus and so is CoinGate. Only NOWPayments among the alternatives settles to a wallet you control.

For an operator in a vertical where provider banking is fragile, that is not an abstract preference. The custody guide sets out the failure this removes and the key-management burden it hands you instead.

Plan the cutover around your platform, not your rate#

If the SoftSwiss integration is doing real work, replacing it is the project and the payment provider is a detail. Scope that first and let it decide the timeline.

Run both live for a full cycle regardless. The integration checklist covers the surfaces a payment touches beyond checkout, and in a specialised platform there are more of them than usual.

What a specialist gives up#

Breadth of platform integrations, mostly. A SoftSwiss connector and an API is a short list beside providers naming five or seven ecommerce platforms, which is the correct trade for an operator and the wrong one for a general store.

If your business has drifted away from the vertical this provider serves, that drift is the real reason to look, and it is a better reason than the rate.

Point of sale and white label are on this card#

Both are documented here alongside mass payouts and fiat settlement, which is a fuller feature surface than the published pricing suggests. Of the alternatives, Cryptomus and CoinGate document white label and neither documents point of sale.

Check which of the four you actually use before shortlisting. The white-label list covers the providers offering branded checkout and the questions worth asking about its price.

The connector is the switching cost#

A payment provider is replaceable in a week; a platform integration your operation runs on is not. Scope that first and let it set the timeline, because every fee argument on this page is smaller than the integration work it implies.

What the table above cannot show you#

Your actual rate here, because there is no public pricing page and the figures live in your onboarding correspondence. Any comparison built on the published side alone is half a comparison.

Nor the fiat withdrawal cost, reported between 1% and 3% and capable of exceeding processing entirely. Ask for it as a number before treating the alternatives as expensive.

Banking fragility is the risk to price#

Providers serving igaming and high-risk lose banking relationships more often than the rest of the category, and every provider on this page is custodial. Ask each where the entity sits and what happens to a held balance if it loses its rails.