Switching · checked 2026-09-02
Best Radom alternatives in 2026
Merchants replacing Radom land on one of three options. CoinGate suits recurring billing and fiat settlement from a Lithuanian company operating since 2014, with the fee table published in full. Cryptomus fits a published 0.4% with no fixed component, seven maintained plugins and recurring billing included. NOWPayments covers flat 1% with no fixed fee, the widest asset list here, and settlement to a wallet you control. The table below carries published rates only; where a provider states nothing, it says so.
Quick verdict
CoinGateRecurring billing and fiat settlement from a Lithuanian company operating since 2014, with the fee table published in full.
CryptomusA published 0.4% with no fixed component, seven maintained plugins and recurring billing included.
NOWPaymentsFlat 1% with no fixed fee, the widest asset list here, and settlement to a wallet you control.
Why do merchants look for a Radom alternative?
The flat 50 cents alongside the 0.5% dominates at small ticket sizes, taking 5.5% of a ten dollar payment. Checked 2026-09-02 against the provider's own page.
The operating entity is incorporated in the Cook Islands and the licensed institutions handling fiat are described but never named. Checked 2026-09-02 against the provider's own page.
Radom at a glance
| Processing from | 0.5% |
|---|---|
| Assets | 12+ |
| Merchant verification | Not disclosed |
| Custody | Not documented |
| Checked | 2026-09-02 against its own pricing page |
Nothing here says stop using it. The 6.0 comes from the same weighted method applied to every indexed provider, and a merchant whose priorities differ from the published weights may well be in the right place already. Both the card and the weights are worth a look first.
How do these alternatives compare?
Method| Gateway | Score | From | Assets | Verification | Settles fiat | Discloses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radom | 6.0 | 0.5% | 12 | Not disclosed | Yes | 68% |
| CoinGate | 6.7 | 1% | 10 | Not disclosed | Yes | 89% |
| Cryptomus | 7.4 | 0.4% | 120 | Not disclosed | 74% | |
| NOWPayments | 8.0 | 1% | 350 | Not disclosed | 68% |
3 best alternatives to Radom
CoinGate
Who it fits. Recurring billing and fiat settlement from a Lithuanian company operating since 2014, with the fee table published in full.
| Processing from | 1% |
|---|---|
| Conversion | 1% |
| Payouts | Crypto withdrawals free; SEPA free; SWIFT 0.50%; crypto payouts EUR 0.50 + 0.5% |
| Assets | 10+ across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin |
| Verification | Not disclosed |
The full CoinGate card has its strengths, its gaps and the fields it declines to publish.
Cryptomus
Who it fits. A published 0.4% with no fixed component, seven maintained plugins and recurring billing included.
| Processing from | 0.4% |
|---|---|
| Conversion | Not published |
| Payouts | Not published |
| Assets | 120+ across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, Polygon, Solana, Litecoin |
| Verification | Not disclosed |
The full Cryptomus card has its strengths, its gaps and the fields it declines to publish.
NOWPayments
Who it fits. Flat 1% with no fixed fee, the widest asset list here, and settlement to a wallet you control.
| Processing from | 1% |
|---|---|
| Conversion | Not published |
| Payouts | Not published |
| Assets | 350+ across Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Tron, Solana, Polygon, Litecoin |
| Verification | Not disclosed |
The full NOWPayments card has its strengths, its gaps and the fields it declines to publish.
On this page
Fifty cents is the whole problem#
Half a percent plus a fixed fifty cents is the lowest published percentage of any custodial provider in this index and one of the most expensive arrangements available for small orders.
At five hundred dollars it works out at 0.6%. At ten dollars it is 5.5%. Every replacement here charges a pure percentage with no fixed component, which is the specific thing being fixed.
Where the company sits#
The operating entity is incorporated in the Cook Islands with a company number published, and fiat services run through licensed institutions that are described but not named. The custody model is not stated at all.
All three replacements improve on that. One names a Lithuanian company from 2014, one a Canadian entity from 2022, and one publishes at least a founding year and a non-custodial design.
What leaving costs you#
A price for almost everything: donations at one percent, on-ramp and off-ramp at one percent each, instant payouts stated as carrying no additional fee. Only the presale product is held for a sales conversation.
Also recurring billing as a first-class product rather than a repeated one-off charge. Two of the three replacements document subscriptions and neither treats them as the centre of the offering.
The three products under one contract#
Subscriptions, mass payouts and itemised invoicing from a single account is a genuinely useful combination for a platform, and it is not common in this index.
Check each replacement on all three axes rather than on the rate. Losing mass payouts to save twenty basis points means adding a second vendor, which costs more than the saving in every case.
Where each replacement lands#
CoinGate is the closest fit on product and the furthest on coverage: recurring billing, fiat settlement and the most completely published fee table here, against an asset list of ten or more.
Cryptomus keeps a low published rate with no fixed component, adds a hundred and twenty assets and seven plugins, and keeps recurring billing. It is the least disruptive of the three.
The API-only shape changes on two routes#
There are no named plugins here, only a hosted checkout and an API, which suits a platform that was going to write code regardless.
Two replacements bring seven and five maintained plugins respectively. If any part of the business runs on a storefront rather than in your own code, that is an upgrade rather than a lateral move.
Twelve assets on ten chains#
A narrow asset list on a wide set of networks is the shape of a provider built around stablecoins rather than coin variety, and for business-to-business flows that shape is correct.
Two replacements widen coverage substantially — a hundred and twenty and more than three hundred and fifty — and one narrows it. The narrowing route compensates with a complete fee table.
Custody is unstated here and answered elsewhere#
This card leaves the custody model blank, which for a provider settling both crypto and fiat is the field a reader should want filled first. Two replacements state theirs plainly.
One of them is non-custodial, which removes the counterparty question entirely and removes fiat settlement along with it. That is a bigger change than the rate and should be a decision rather than a consequence.
What to establish before switching#
Your own average order value, measured rather than estimated. Above about a hundred dollars the fixed fee stops mattering and this page may be unnecessary; below it the case for moving is arithmetic.
Then ask each replacement whether recurring billing includes retries and dunning or only repeated charges. The word subscription covers both and the difference is a month of engineering.
The case for staying#
If invoices are large, the fixed fifty cents is noise and the published percentage is the lowest available from any custodial provider in this index. At five hundred dollars a payment nothing here is cheaper.
The product breadth is also real. Subscriptions, payouts and invoicing under one contract is what a platform actually needs, and assembling it from two vendors elsewhere costs more than the difference in rate.
What a switch actually takes here#
Everything is API-driven, so the migration is code you control rather than a plugin somebody else maintains. That makes the technical side predictable and the timeline honest.
Subscriptions are the hard part. Existing recurring authorisations do not transfer between providers, so plan a re-authorisation campaign to customers rather than a silent cutover.
How to migrate from Radom
- Measure your real average order value. Pull twelve months of payments and compute the mean rather than guessing it. Above about a hundred dollars the fixed fifty cents is irrelevant and the strongest reason to leave disappears entirely.
- Plan the subscription re-authorisation. Recurring crypto authorisations do not move between providers, so every active subscriber has to approve the new arrangement. Write the customer email before the technical migration, because it sets the timeline.
- Keep mass payouts and acceptance together. Splitting them across two vendors reintroduces the reconciliation problem this provider removed. Confirm the replacement runs bulk payouts from the same balance before treating a lower rate as a saving.
- Ask each replacement who holds the money. Custody is unstated here, so you may not know what you are moving from. Establish the answer at the destination in writing, along with which regulated entity signs the contract.
- Test on-ramp and off-ramp costs separately. The one percent quoted here for each is published; at the replacements those legs may be bundled, unpriced or absent. If either matters to your flow, price it explicitly rather than assuming parity.
Questions merchants ask
Why do merchants leave Radom?
The flat 50 cents alongside the 0.5% dominates at small ticket sizes, taking 5.5% of a ten dollar payment. The operating entity is incorporated in the Cook Islands and the licensed institutions handling fiat are described but never named. Both points were checked against the provider's own pages on 2026-09-02.
What is the closest alternative to Radom?
CoinGate is the closest substitute for most merchants: Recurring billing and fiat settlement from a Lithuanian company operating since 2014, with the fee table published in full. It scores 6.7 against 6.0 on the same published weights.
Is switching crypto payment gateway difficult?
It depends on what you built on top. A hosted checkout moves in an afternoon; subscriptions and automated reconciliation take weeks.
Will I lose payment history when I switch?
You keep what you download. Nothing on the Radom pages commits to access after an account closes.